spending: has trait fun

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.66
, bill
Weight: 0.58
, behavior
Weight: 0.58
, policy
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.57
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.35
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.34
, dollar bill
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, appropriation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has trait fun 1.00
is good thing 0.78
is thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(appropriation, is thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(appropriation, is thing)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(appropriation, is thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(spending, has trait fun)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(spending, is thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(spending, is thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(spending, is thing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(spending, is good thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(spending, is good thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(spending, is good thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(spending, is good thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(spending, is thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spending, has trait fun)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(spending, has trait fun)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spending, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(appropriation, is thing)