spending: help economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activity
Weight: 0.66
, bill
Weight: 0.58
, behavior
Weight: 0.58
, policy
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.57
Siblings business activity
Weight: 0.35
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.34
, dollar bill
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, appropriation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
help economy 1.00
be for economy 0.95
be good for economy 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(consumption, be good for economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(consumption, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(consumption, be good for economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(spending, help economy)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spending, be for economy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(spending, be for economy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(spending, be for economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(spending, be good for economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(spending, be good for economy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spending, be for economy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(spending, be good for economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(spending, help economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(spending, help economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(spending, help economy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(consumption, be good for economy)