sperm: have mitochondria in midpoint

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents human cell
Weight: 0.56
, cell
Weight: 0.53
, tissue
Weight: 0.53
, substance
Weight: 0.50
Siblings sperm cell
Weight: 0.39
, blood cell
Weight: 0.35
, white blood cell
Weight: 0.34
, red blood cell
Weight: 0.34
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have mitochondria in midpoint 1.00
has physical part mitochondria 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sperm cell, has physical part mitochondria)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sperm cell, has physical part mitochondria)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sperm cell, has physical part mitochondria)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sperm, has physical part mitochondria)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sperm, has physical part mitochondria)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(sperm, has physical part mitochondria)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sperm, has physical part mitochondria)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(sperm, have mitochondria in midpoint)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sperm cell, has physical part mitochondria)