sphinx: be at egypt

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.66
, statue
Weight: 0.58
, moth
Weight: 0.57
, monster
Weight: 0.56
, detail
Weight: 0.55
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.35
, raven
Weight: 0.35
, unicorn
Weight: 0.35
, owl
Weight: 0.34
, dinosaur
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at egypt 1.00
be at greece 0.79
be at italy 0.77
be at usa 0.77
be at africa 0.76
be at mexico 0.76
be at new mexico 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at greece)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at italy)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at new mexico)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at usa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lizard, be at usa)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at usa)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lizard, be at new mexico)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at new mexico)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lizard, be at italy)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at italy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lizard, be at greece)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at greece)

Salient implies Plausible

0.04
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sphinx, be at egypt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sphinx, be at egypt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sphinx, be at egypt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lizard, be at usa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lizard, be at greece)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lizard, be at italy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sphinx, be at egypt)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lizard, be at new mexico)