spice: were expensive in middle ages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seasoning
Weight: 0.65
, staple
Weight: 0.62
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
, brand
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fennel
Weight: 0.72
, mustard seed
Weight: 0.71
, black pepper
Weight: 0.70
, saffron
Weight: 0.70
, allspice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
were expensive in middle ages 1.00
were used in middle ages 0.96
were expensive in ages 0.96
were valuable during middle ages 0.92
were used in ages 0.91
were valuable during ages 0.87
were expensive during 1300s 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(spice, were expensive in middle ages)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(spice, were used in middle ages)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(spice, were used in middle ages)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(spice, were used in middle ages)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(spice, were expensive during 1300s)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(spice, were expensive during 1300s)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(spice, were expensive during 1300s)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(spice, were valuable during middle ages)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(spice, were used in middle ages)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(spice, were expensive during 1300s)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(spice, were valuable during middle ages)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(spice, were valuable during middle ages)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(spice, were valuable during middle ages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(spice, were expensive in middle ages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(spice, were expensive in middle ages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(spice, were expensive in middle ages)