spice: were important in history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seasoning
Weight: 0.65
, staple
Weight: 0.62
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
, brand
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fennel
Weight: 0.72
, mustard seed
Weight: 0.71
, black pepper
Weight: 0.70
, saffron
Weight: 0.70
, allspice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
were important in history 1.00
be important to world history 0.91
were important in 1450 0.88
were important part of life 0.84
were important in times 0.83
were important in century 0.82
were important in 15th century 0.82
be important to organisation 0.81
were important in medieval times 0.79
were valuable 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(spice, were important in history)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(brand, be important to organisation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(brand, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(spice, were important in history)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(spice, were important in history)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(spice, be important to world history)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(spice, be important to world history)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(spice, were important in 1450)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(spice, be important to world history)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(spice, were important in 1450)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(spice, be important to world history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(spice, were important in 1450)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(spice, were important in 15th century)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(spice, were important in medieval times)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(spice, were important in 15th century)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(spice, were important in medieval times)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(spice, were important in 15th century)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(spice, were important in medieval times)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in 1450)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in 15th century)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in medieval times)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(spice, were important in history)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(brand, be important to organisation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(spice, were important in history)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(brand, be important to organisation)