spice: were such valued commodity in europe

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seasoning
Weight: 0.65
, staple
Weight: 0.62
, ingredient
Weight: 0.60
, brand
Weight: 0.60
Siblings fennel
Weight: 0.72
, mustard seed
Weight: 0.71
, black pepper
Weight: 0.70
, saffron
Weight: 0.70
, allspice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
were such valued commodity in europe 1.00
were expensive in europe 0.83
were important in europe 0.82
were desirable trade items 0.78
were expensive for europeans 0.77
were important part of european life 0.77
is world 's most expensive food 0.76
were trade items 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(saffron, is world 's most expensive food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(saffron, is world 's most expensive food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(saffron, is world 's most expensive food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(spice, were such valued commodity in europe)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(spice, were expensive for europeans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(spice, were expensive for europeans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(spice, were expensive for europeans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(spice, were desirable trade items)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(spice, were desirable trade items)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(spice, were desirable trade items)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(spice, were expensive for europeans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important in europe)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(spice, were desirable trade items)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(spice, were important in europe)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spice, were important part of european life)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(spice, were important in europe)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(spice, were important part of european life)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(spice, were important in europe)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(spice, were important part of european life)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(spice, were important part of european life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spice, were such valued commodity in europe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(spice, were such valued commodity in europe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spice, were such valued commodity in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(saffron, is world 's most expensive food)