spider: be considered as insects

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.73
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, insect
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, arachnid
Weight: 0.52
Siblings tarantula
Weight: 0.66
, black widow spider
Weight: 0.64
, earwig
Weight: 0.44
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.39
, lizard
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as insects 1.00
be consider as insects 0.96
is insects 0.95
be different from insects 0.93
be same from insects 0.92
be differ to insects 0.88
is insect 0.88
get mistaken for insects 0.88
eat moths 0.83
eat male moths 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arachnid, be different from insects)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(spider, be considered as insects)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(insect, is insects)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(spider, be considered as insects)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(arachnid, is insects)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(spider, be considered as insects)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(arachnid, is insects)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(insect, is insects)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arachnid, be different from insects)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(arachnid, be different from insects)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(arachnid, is insects)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(insect, is insects)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(insect, is insects)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(arachnid, is insects)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arachnid, be different from insects)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(spider, be considered as insects)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(spider, is insects)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(spider, be consider as insects)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(spider, is insects)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(spider, is insects)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(spider, be consider as insects)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(spider, be different from insects)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(spider, be same from insects)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(spider, is insects)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(spider, is insect)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(spider, be different from insects)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(spider, be same from insects)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(spider, be differ to insects)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(spider, is insect)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(spider, is insect)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(spider, be differ to insects)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(spider, is insect)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(spider, be consider as insects)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(spider, be different from insects)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(spider, be consider as insects)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(spider, be same from insects)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(spider, be different from insects)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spider, be differ to insects)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(spider, be same from insects)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(spider, be differ to insects)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(spider, be considered as insects)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(arachnid, is insects)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(insect, is insects)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(arachnid, be different from insects)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(arachnid, is insects)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(insect, is insects)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(spider, be considered as insects)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(arachnid, be different from insects)