spider: be good for garden

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.73
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, insect
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, arachnid
Weight: 0.52
Siblings tarantula
Weight: 0.66
, black widow spider
Weight: 0.64
, earwig
Weight: 0.44
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.39
, lizard
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for garden 1.00
be found in meadow 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(insect, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(spider, be good for garden)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(spider, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(insect, be good for garden)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(spider, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(insect, be good for garden)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(insect, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(spider, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(spider, be good for garden)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(spider, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(spider, be good for garden)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(spider, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(spider, be found in meadow)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(spider, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(spider, be found in meadow)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(spider, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(spider, be found in meadow)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(spider, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(spider, be found in meadow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(spider, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(spider, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(spider, be good for garden)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(spider, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(spider, be good for garden)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(spider, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(insect, be good for garden)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(spider, be good for garden) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(insect, be good for garden)