spider: bite

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.73
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, insect
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, arachnid
Weight: 0.52
Siblings tarantula
Weight: 0.66
, black widow spider
Weight: 0.64
, earwig
Weight: 0.44
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.39
, lizard
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
bite 1.00
bite people 0.96
know bite 0.94
bite at night 0.92
bite humans 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(insect, bite)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(spider, bite)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(animal, bite)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(spider, bite)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(animal, bite)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(insect, bite)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(animal, bite)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(insect, bite)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(tarantula, bite)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(earwig, bite)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(earwig, bite humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(insect, bite)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(spider, bite)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(animal, bite)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(spider, bite)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(earwig, bite)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(earwig, bite)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(tarantula, bite)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(tarantula, bite)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(earwig, bite humans)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(earwig, bite humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(spider, bite)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(spider, bite at night)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(spider, bite at night)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(spider, bite at night)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(spider, bite at night)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spider, bite)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(spider, bite)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(animal, bite)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(insect, bite)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(earwig, bite)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(earwig, bite humans)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(tarantula, bite)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(animal, bite)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(spider, bite)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(insect, bite)