spinach: be bad for kidney stones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh fruit
Weight: 0.67
, flavor
Weight: 0.65
, vegetable
Weight: 0.63
, food
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.37
, tomato
Weight: 0.37
, broccoli
Weight: 0.37
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for kidney stones 1.00
give kidney stones 0.97
be bad for kidneys 0.86
be bad for bones 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be bad for kidneys)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(tomato, be bad for kidneys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tomato, be bad for kidneys)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(spinach, be bad for kidney stones)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for kidneys)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for bones)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(spinach, be bad for kidneys)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(spinach, be bad for bones)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(spinach, be bad for bones)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(spinach, be bad for kidneys)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(spinach, be bad for bones)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(spinach, be bad for kidneys)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for kidney stones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(spinach, be bad for kidney stones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for kidney stones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for kidneys)