spinach: be bad for rosacea

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh fruit
Weight: 0.67
, flavor
Weight: 0.65
, vegetable
Weight: 0.63
, food
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.37
, tomato
Weight: 0.37
, broccoli
Weight: 0.37
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for rosacea 1.00
be bad for gout 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, be bad for gout)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(broccoli, be bad for gout)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(tomato, be bad for gout)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cauliflower, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, be bad for gout)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(broccoli, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(broccoli, be bad for gout)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(tomato, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tomato, be bad for gout)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(spinach, be bad for rosacea)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for gout)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(spinach, be bad for gout)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(spinach, be bad for gout)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(spinach, be bad for gout)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for rosacea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(spinach, be bad for rosacea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(broccoli, be bad for gout)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cauliflower, be bad for gout)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(spinach, be bad for rosacea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tomato, be bad for gout)