spinal cord: have central canal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents peripheral nervous system
Weight: 0.69
, nerve
Weight: 0.66
, ligament
Weight: 0.66
, cord
Weight: 0.65
, body part
Weight: 0.64
Siblings optic nerve
Weight: 0.71
, sciatic nerve
Weight: 0.68
, motor neuron
Weight: 0.57
, extension cord
Weight: 0.38
, achilles tendon
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have central canal 1.00
has physical part canal 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spinal cord, have central canal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(spinal cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cord, have central canal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cord, have central canal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(spinal cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, have central canal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(spinal cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(spinal cord, have central canal)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(spinal cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, has physical part canal)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(spinal cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(spinal cord, has physical part canal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(spinal cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(spinal cord, has physical part canal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(spinal cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has physical part canal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(spinal cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spinal cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, have central canal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(spinal cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(spinal cord, have central canal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cord, have central canal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(spinal cord, have central canal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cord, have central canal)