spinal cord: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents peripheral nervous system
Weight: 0.69
, nerve
Weight: 0.66
, ligament
Weight: 0.66
, cord
Weight: 0.65
, body part
Weight: 0.64
Siblings optic nerve
Weight: 0.71
, sciatic nerve
Weight: 0.68
, motor neuron
Weight: 0.57
, extension cord
Weight: 0.38
, achilles tendon
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
has quality bad 0.87
has quality function 0.80
has quality spot 0.79
has quality worse 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cord, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ligament, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(nerve, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spinal cord, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(cord, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(nerve, has quality function)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(ligament, has quality worse)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cord, has quality function)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(body part, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ligament, has quality worse)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cord, is quality)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cord, has quality function)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(nerve, has quality function)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(motor neuron, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(body part, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(cord, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(ligament, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(nerve, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(motor neuron, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(motor neuron, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(optic nerve, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(optic nerve, has quality spot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(spinal cord, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spinal cord, has quality function)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(spinal cord, has quality function)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spinal cord, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(nerve, has quality function)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cord, is quality)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ligament, has quality worse)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cord, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(optic nerve, has quality spot)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(motor neuron, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(nerve, has quality function)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cord, is quality)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(body part, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ligament, has quality worse)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(spinal cord, is quality)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cord, has quality function)