spit: be used to insult person

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.44
, time
Weight: 0.43
, word
Weight: 0.42
, material
Weight: 0.41
Siblings fart
Weight: 0.33
, vomit
Weight: 0.33
, bad breath
Weight: 0.32
, nail polish
Weight: 0.32
, poop
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to insult person 1.00
be used to insult 0.99
causes offend other person 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(word, be used to insult)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(spit, be used to insult person)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(spit, be used to insult person)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(word, be used to insult)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(spit, be used to insult person)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(word, be used to insult)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(word, be used to insult)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(spit, be used to insult person)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(spit, be used to insult person)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(spit, be used to insult person)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(spit, be used to insult person)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(spit, be used to insult person)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(spit, causes offend other person)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(spit, be used to insult person)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(spit, causes offend other person)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(spit, be used to insult person)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(spit, causes offend other person)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(spit, be used to insult person)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(spit, causes offend other person)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(spit, be used to insult person)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(spit, be used to insult person)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(spit, be used to insult person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(spit, be used to insult person)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(spit, be used to insult person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(spit, be used to insult person)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(word, be used to insult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(spit, be used to insult person)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(word, be used to insult)