spit: have bubbles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.44
, time
Weight: 0.43
, word
Weight: 0.42
, material
Weight: 0.41
Siblings spitting
Weight: 0.33
, fart
Weight: 0.33
, vomit
Weight: 0.33
, bad breath
Weight: 0.32
, nail polish
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bubbles 1.00
be like soap bubbles 0.89
be like bubbly soap bubbles 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, have bubbles)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(nail polish, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(nail polish, have bubbles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(spit, have bubbles)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(spit, be like soap bubbles)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(spit, be like bubbly soap bubbles)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(spit, be like bubbly soap bubbles)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(spit, be like soap bubbles)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(spit, be like bubbly soap bubbles)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(spit, be like soap bubbles)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(spit, be like bubbly soap bubbles)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(spit, be like soap bubbles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(spit, have bubbles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(spit, have bubbles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(spit, have bubbles)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nail polish, have bubbles)