splint: is walgreens

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, article
Weight: 0.48
, equipment
Weight: 0.45
, product
Weight: 0.45
, ankle
Weight: 0.44
Siblings wrist
Weight: 0.34
, implant
Weight: 0.33
, cleat
Weight: 0.33
, helmet
Weight: 0.33
, velcro
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is walgreens 1.00
is walmart 0.80
is cvs 0.79
is uk 0.76
use unsilenced usp 0.76
use usp 0.76
is expensive uk 0.76
tj maxx 0.75
be expensive in uk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(device, use unsilenced usp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(splint, is walgreens)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(device, use unsilenced usp)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(device, use unsilenced usp)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(implant, be expensive in uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(implant, is expensive uk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(implant, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(device, use unsilenced usp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(splint, is walgreens)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(implant, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(implant, is uk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(implant, be expensive in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(implant, be expensive in uk)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(implant, is expensive uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(implant, is expensive uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(splint, is walgreens)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(splint, is cvs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(splint, is cvs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(splint, is cvs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(splint, is walmart)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(splint, is walmart)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(splint, is walmart)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(splint, is cvs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(splint, is walmart)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(splint, is walgreens)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(splint, is walgreens)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(device, use unsilenced usp)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(implant, is uk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(implant, be expensive in uk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(implant, is expensive uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(splint, is walgreens) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(device, use unsilenced usp)