spoiler: be placed at back

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents detail
Weight: 0.57
, part
Weight: 0.52
, candidate
Weight: 0.50
, feature
Weight: 0.49
Siblings preview
Weight: 0.31
, heating element
Weight: 0.30
, bay window
Weight: 0.29
, wrinkle
Weight: 0.29
, title
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be placed at back 1.00
be placed at back of sports cars 0.86
be placed in election 0.77
be on subreddits 0.76
appear at given time 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(candidate, be placed in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(spoiler, be placed at back)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(part, appear at given time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(spoiler, be placed at back)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(part, appear at given time)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(candidate, be placed in election)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(candidate, be placed in election)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(part, appear at given time)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(candidate, be placed in election) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(spoiler, be placed at back)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(part, appear at given time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(spoiler, be placed at back)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(spoiler, be placed at back)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be placed at back of sports cars)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(spoiler, be placed at back of sports cars)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(spoiler, be placed at back of sports cars)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(spoiler, be on subreddits)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(spoiler, be on subreddits)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be on subreddits)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(spoiler, be on subreddits)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(spoiler, be placed at back of sports cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be placed at back)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(spoiler, be placed at back)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(part, appear at given time)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(candidate, be placed in election)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(part, appear at given time)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(spoiler, be placed at back) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(candidate, be placed in election)