sponge: be at bottom of sea

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.68
, object
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.62
Siblings yeast
Weight: 0.35
, starfish
Weight: 0.34
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, amoeba
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bottom of sea 1.00
be at sea 0.88
be at ocean 0.81
be at any ocean 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creature, be at sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sponge, be at bottom of sea)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sponge, be at bottom of sea)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at any ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sponge, be at bottom of sea)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(creature, be at sea)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(creature, be at ocean)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(creature, be at any ocean)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at any ocean)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at sea)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at ocean)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(giant squid, be at bottom of sea)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(starfish, be at bottom of sea)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(starfish, be at sea)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(giant squid, be at sea)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(starfish, be at ocean)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creature, be at sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(sponge, be at bottom of sea)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(sponge, be at bottom of sea)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(creature, be at any ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(sponge, be at bottom of sea)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(starfish, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(starfish, be at bottom of sea)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(giant squid, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(giant squid, be at bottom of sea)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(giant squid, be at sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(giant squid, be at sea)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(starfish, be at sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(starfish, be at sea)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(starfish, be at ocean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(starfish, be at ocean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(sponge, be at bottom of sea)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sponge, be at bottom of sea)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(creature, be at sea)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(creature, be at ocean)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(creature, be at any ocean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(giant squid, be at bottom of sea)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(starfish, be at bottom of sea)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(giant squid, be at sea)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(starfish, be at sea)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(starfish, be at ocean)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(creature, be at sea)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(creature, be at ocean)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sponge, be at bottom of sea) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(creature, be at any ocean)