sponge: be atypical animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.68
, object
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.62
Siblings yeast
Weight: 0.35
, starfish
Weight: 0.34
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, amoeba
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be atypical animals 1.00
is atypical animals 1.00
be different from animals 0.82
be different from other animals 0.81
is animals 0.80
be considered animals 0.80
most primitive kinds of animals 0.80
be considered primitive animals 0.80
be animals 0.80
be considered most primitive animals 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(amoeba, be considered animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(amoeba, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(amoeba, be considered animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(sponge, be atypical animals)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sponge, be considered animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sponge, be different from other animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sponge, be considered primitive animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sponge, be different from other animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(sponge, be considered animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sponge, be considered animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sponge, be different from other animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sponge, be considered primitive animals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sponge, be considered primitive animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be different from other animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered primitive animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be atypical animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sponge, be atypical animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be atypical animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(amoeba, be considered animals)