sponge: be called pore-bearing animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.68
, object
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.62
Siblings yeast
Weight: 0.35
, starfish
Weight: 0.34
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, amoeba
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called animals 1.00
be called pore-bearing animals 1.00
be animals 0.96
is animals 0.96
be considered animals 0.93
be considered as animals 0.91
be referred to animals 0.91
be known as animals 0.90
be different from animals 0.89
is animal 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(organism, is animal)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(organism, is animal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(organism, is animal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(amoeba, be considered animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(organism, is animal)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(amoeba, be considered animals)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(amoeba, be considered animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(sponge, is animal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(sponge, is animal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sponge, be considered animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sponge, be referred to animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(sponge, be considered animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(sponge, is animal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be referred to animals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(sponge, be referred to animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sponge, be considered animals)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sponge, be referred to animals)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sponge, is animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(organism, is animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(amoeba, be considered animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(organism, is animal)