sponge: be referred to animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.68
, object
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.62
Siblings yeast
Weight: 0.35
, starfish
Weight: 0.34
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, giant squid
Weight: 0.34
, amoeba
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be referred to animals 1.00
be called animals 0.91
be called pore-bearing animals 0.91
be considered animals 0.89
be considered as animals 0.88
be known as animals 0.88
is animals 0.86
be animals 0.86
be classified as animals 0.84
be considered animal 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(amoeba, be considered animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(amoeba, be considered animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(amoeba, be considered animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sponge, be referred to animals)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be called pore-bearing animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sponge, be considered animal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sponge, be considered animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sponge, be considered animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sponge, be considered animal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(sponge, be considered animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(sponge, be considered animal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sponge, be classified as animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sponge, be classified as animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sponge, be classified as animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be classified as animals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be considered animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be referred to animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sponge, be referred to animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sponge, be referred to animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(amoeba, be considered animals)