spoon: has physical part holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.74
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.70
, spatula
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.62
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.70
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.37
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.36
, skillet
Weight: 0.36
, frying pan
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part holes 1.00
have holes in them 0.89
have hole in middle 0.83
be left in hole 0.81
has physical part zones 0.78
be left in hole in tree 0.76
has physical part pockets 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(spoon, has physical part holes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(item, be left in hole in tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(spoon, has physical part holes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(item, be left in hole in tree)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(spatula, has physical part holes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(item, be left in hole in tree)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, have hole in middle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, have holes in them)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, has physical part zones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(spatula, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(item, be left in hole in tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(wooden spoon, have hole in middle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, have hole in middle)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(wooden spoon, have holes in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, have holes in them)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(frying pan, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(frying pan, has physical part zones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(spoon, has physical part holes)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(spoon, have holes in them)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have hole in middle)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(spoon, have holes in them)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(spoon, have hole in middle)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part pockets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(spoon, have hole in middle)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(spoon, has physical part pockets)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(spoon, have hole in middle)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(spoon, has physical part pockets)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(spoon, have holes in them)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(spoon, has physical part pockets)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(spoon, have holes in them)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(spoon, has physical part holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spatula, has physical part holes)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(item, be left in hole in tree)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has physical part holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, have hole in middle)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, have holes in them)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(frying pan, has physical part zones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spatula, has physical part holes)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(spoon, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(item, be left in hole in tree)