spoon: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents utensil
Weight: 0.74
, cooking utensil
Weight: 0.70
, spatula
Weight: 0.62
, item
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.62
Siblings wooden spoon
Weight: 0.70
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.37
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.36
, skillet
Weight: 0.36
, frying pan
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality use 0.86
has quality worth 0.82
be bad for environment 0.80
be bad for game 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(utensil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(utensil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(utensil, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(utensil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality use)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(utensil, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(utensil, has quality worth)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(item, be bad for game)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(utensil, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality use)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(utensil, has quality worth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(item, be bad for game)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(utensil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(utensil, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(utensil, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(utensil, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(utensil, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(skillet, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(spoon, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(spoon, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(spoon, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(spoon, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality use)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality worth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(utensil, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(skillet, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality use)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(utensil, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(utensil, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(spoon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)