sport: is enjoyable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.63
, discipline
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, attraction
Weight: 0.61
Siblings auto racing
Weight: 0.77
, professional football
Weight: 0.74
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.73
, football team
Weight: 0.73
, professional wrestling
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
is enjoyable 1.00
be fun 0.85
play fun 0.80
has trait fun 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cross country skiing, has trait fun)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cross country skiing, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(cross country skiing, has trait fun)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sport, is enjoyable)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sport, be fun)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(sport, play fun)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(sport, be fun)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sport, has trait fun)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(sport, play fun)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(sport, has trait fun)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sport, be fun)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sport, play fun)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sport, be fun)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sport, has trait fun)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sport, has trait fun)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sport, play fun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sport, is enjoyable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sport, is enjoyable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sport, is enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cross country skiing, has trait fun)