sports car: have performance against european

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
have performance against european 1.00
have poor performance against european 0.97
have performance 0.79
have poor performance 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(sports car, have performance against european)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(sports car, have poor performance against european)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(sports car, have poor performance against european)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(sports car, have poor performance against european)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(sports car, have performance)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have poor performance against european)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sports car, have performance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(sports car, have performance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(sports car, have poor performance)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(sports car, have poor performance)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sports car, have poor performance)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have poor performance)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have performance against european)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sports car, have performance against european)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sports car, have performance against european)