sports car: have poor performance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
have poor performance 1.00
have performance 0.91
have poor performance against european 0.86
have performance against european 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(sports car, have poor performance)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(sports car, have performance)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sports car, have performance)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(sports car, have poor performance against european)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(sports car, have performance against european)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(sports car, have performance)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(sports car, have poor performance against european)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(sports car, have poor performance against european)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sports car, have performance against european)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have poor performance against european)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(sports car, have performance against european)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have performance against european)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sports car, have poor performance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(sports car, have poor performance)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sports car, have poor performance)