spread: be in free market economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.53
, term
Weight: 0.53
, product
Weight: 0.52
Siblings probable cause
Weight: 0.31
, cause
Weight: 0.31
, propagation
Weight: 0.31
, dispersion
Weight: 0.31
, accumulation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in free market economy 1.00
is near markets 0.79
related to allocation in economy 0.78
related to allocation economy 0.77
get larger during market hours 0.77
affects real estate markets 0.76
related to allocation of resources in economy 0.76
related to allocation resources economy 0.75
be for businesses 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spread, be in free market economy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(factor, affects real estate markets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spread, be in free market economy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(problem, related to allocation resources economy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spread, be in free market economy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spread, be in free market economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(problem, related to allocation resources economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(factor, affects real estate markets)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(issue, be for businesses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(problem, related to allocation resources economy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(factor, affects real estate markets)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be for businesses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(spread, be in free market economy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(factor, affects real estate markets)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(spread, be in free market economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(problem, related to allocation resources economy)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(spread, be in free market economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(spread, be in free market economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(spread, be in free market economy)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(spread, get larger during market hours)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(spread, get larger during market hours)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(spread, get larger during market hours)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(spread, get larger during market hours)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(spread, be in free market economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(problem, related to allocation resources economy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(factor, affects real estate markets)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(problem, related to allocation resources economy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(factor, affects real estate markets)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(spread, be in free market economy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)