spreadsheet: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer program
Weight: 0.69
, tool
Weight: 0.69
, computer file
Weight: 0.67
, document
Weight: 0.64
, web browser
Weight: 0.63
Siblings database
Weight: 0.61
, calculator
Weight: 0.36
, computer game
Weight: 0.35
, computer disk
Weight: 0.35
, computer virus
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality system 0.82
has quality worth 0.82
has quality plus 0.80
be bad for us 0.80
has quality joke 0.80
have bad impact 0.77
be good for business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(computer program, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality system)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality system)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer game, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer game, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(database, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality joke)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(computer game, be bad for us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(calculator, has quality plus)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(computer game, have bad impact)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(computer program, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(computer program, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(database, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(database, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(computer game, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(computer game, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(database, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(database, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(calculator, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(computer game, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(computer game, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(calculator, has quality plus)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(calculator, has quality plus)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(computer game, have bad impact)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(computer game, have bad impact)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality joke)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(computer game, be bad for us)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(computer game, be bad for us)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(spreadsheet, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, be good for business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, be good for business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, be good for business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(spreadsheet, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(spreadsheet, be good for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality system)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(computer game, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(database, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(computer game, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(database, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(calculator, has quality plus)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality joke)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer game, be bad for us)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer game, have bad impact)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality system)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spreadsheet, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality good)