sprite: taste good together

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.63
, soft drink
Weight: 0.60
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.60
, brand
Weight: 0.60
Siblings polygon
Weight: 0.33
, comet
Weight: 0.32
, meteor
Weight: 0.32
, doll
Weight: 0.32
, soda pop
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good together 1.00
taste good 0.91
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sprite, taste good together)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sprite, taste good together)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sprite, taste good together)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sprite, taste good together)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sprite, taste good together)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sprite, taste good together)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sprite, taste good together)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(sprite, taste good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sprite, taste good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sprite, taste good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sprite, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(sprite, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sprite, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sprite, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good together)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sprite, taste good together)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(sprite, taste good together) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)