spy: wear trench coats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.56
, agent
Weight: 0.56
, book
Weight: 0.51
, program
Weight: 0.50
, element
Weight: 0.47
Siblings travel agent
Weight: 0.32
, movie
Weight: 0.31
, film maker
Weight: 0.31
, movie star
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear trench coats 1.00
wear turtlenecks 0.79
wear black 0.77
wear suits 0.77
wear sunglasses 0.76
wearing sun glasses 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spy, wear trench coats)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spy, wear trench coats)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(agent, wear suits)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spy, wear trench coats)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spy, wear trench coats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(spy, wear trench coats)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(spy, wear turtlenecks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear turtlenecks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(spy, wear turtlenecks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(spy, wear turtlenecks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(spy, wearing sun glasses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(spy, wearing sun glasses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spy, wear suits)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(spy, wearing sun glasses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(spy, wearing sun glasses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear sunglasses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(spy, wear sunglasses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(spy, wear sunglasses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(spy, wear sunglasses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(spy, wear suits)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(spy, wear black)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear black)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(spy, wear suits)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear suits)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(spy, wear black)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(spy, wear black)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(spy, wear trench coats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(agent, wear suits)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(agent, wear sunglasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(agent, wear suits)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(spy, wear trench coats)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(agent, wear sunglasses)