spy: wear tuxedos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.56
, agent
Weight: 0.56
, book
Weight: 0.51
, program
Weight: 0.50
, element
Weight: 0.47
Siblings travel agent
Weight: 0.32
, movie
Weight: 0.31
, film maker
Weight: 0.31
, movie star
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear tuxedos 1.00
wear suits 0.80
wear black 0.80
wear suits in movies 0.79
wear turtlenecks 0.79
wear sunglasses 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(spy, wear tuxedos)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(spy, wear tuxedos)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(agent, wear suits)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear suits)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(agent, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(agent, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(spy, wear tuxedos)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(agent, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(spy, wear tuxedos)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(movie star, wear sunglasses)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(spy, wear tuxedos)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(spy, wear suits in movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(spy, wear suits in movies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear suits in movies)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(spy, wear suits in movies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear turtlenecks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(spy, wear turtlenecks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(spy, wear turtlenecks)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(spy, wear turtlenecks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear sunglasses)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spy, wear suits)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(spy, wear sunglasses)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(spy, wear sunglasses)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(spy, wear sunglasses)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(spy, wear suits)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear black)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(spy, wear suits)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear suits)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(spy, wear black)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(spy, wear black)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(spy, wear black)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(spy, wear tuxedos)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(agent, wear suits)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(agent, wear sunglasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(movie star, wear sunglasses)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(agent, wear suits)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(spy, wear tuxedos)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(agent, wear sunglasses)