sql: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.65
, programming language
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.54
, standard
Weight: 0.53
, format
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.36
, perl
Weight: 0.35
, chinese language
Weight: 0.35
, english language
Weight: 0.35
, css
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality better 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sql, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sql, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(language, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(css, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sql, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sql, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(css, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(css, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(sql, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sql, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sql, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sql, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sql, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(css, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)