squid: adapt to antarctica

Related concepts

Parents	mollusk Weight: 0.70 , bait Weight: 0.69 , creature Weight: 0.66 , dish Weight: 0.63
Siblings	giant squid Weight: 0.72 , octopus Weight: 0.68 , whale shark Weight: 0.39 , hammerhead shark Weight: 0.38 , dolphin Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
adapt to antarctica	1.00
reproduce	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(mollusk, reproduce) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(squid, adapt to antarctica)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(mollusk, reproduce)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(mollusk, reproduce)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(octopus, reproduce)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(mollusk, reproduce) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(squid, adapt to antarctica)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

Remarkable(octopus, reproduce) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(octopus, reproduce)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(squid, adapt to antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(squid, reproduce)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(squid, reproduce)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(squid, reproduce)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(squid, reproduce)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(squid, adapt to antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(squid, adapt to antarctica)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(mollusk, reproduce)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(octopus, reproduce)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(squid, adapt to antarctica) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(mollusk, reproduce)