squirrel: be at city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.71
, wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.68
Siblings owl
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at city 1.00
be at town 0.85
be at state park 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fox, be at city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fox, be at city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(squirrel, be at city)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(squirrel, be at town)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(squirrel, be at state park)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at town)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at state park)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(squirrel, be at town)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at town)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(squirrel, be at state park)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at state park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fox, be at city)