squirrel: be at new york

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.71
, wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.68
Siblings owl
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at new york 1.00
be at new hampshire 0.79
be at new mexico 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at new york)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at new hampshire)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at new mexico)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(squirrel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fox, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fox, be at new york)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(squirrel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(lizard, be at new mexico) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at new mexico)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(squirrel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fox, be at new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fox, be at new hampshire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(squirrel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(squirrel, be at new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(squirrel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(squirrel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fox, be at new york)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lizard, be at new mexico)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fox, be at new hampshire)