squirrel: be at state park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.71
, wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.68
Siblings owl
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at state park 1.00
be at park 0.91
be at city 0.80
be at reptile park 0.78
be at town 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pet, be at park)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at state park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pet, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pet, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at reptile park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(pet, be at park)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(squirrel, be at state park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(lizard, be at reptile park)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at reptile park)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(fox, be at city)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fox, be at city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(squirrel, be at state park)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(squirrel, be at park)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(squirrel, be at city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(squirrel, be at town)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at park)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at park)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(squirrel, be at park)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(squirrel, be at city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at town)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at town)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(squirrel, be at town)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at state park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at state park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pet, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, be at reptile park)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fox, be at city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(squirrel, be at state park)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pet, be at park)