squirrel: be at yard

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.71
, wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, pet
Weight: 0.68
Siblings owl
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.38
, lizard
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at yard 1.00
be at back yard 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at yard)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at back yard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at back yard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(squirrel, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(fox, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fox, be at back yard)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(squirrel, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lizard, be at back yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at back yard)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(squirrel, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lizard, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at yard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(squirrel, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(squirrel, be at yard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(squirrel, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at yard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(squirrel, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at yard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lizard, be at yard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(fox, be at back yard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lizard, be at back yard)