squirrel: be considered animal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.71
, wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.68
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, owl
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38
, raccoon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered animal 1.00
is mammal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be considered animal)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(raccoon, is mammal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(squirrel, be considered animal)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(raccoon, is mammal)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(raccoon, is mammal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(squirrel, be considered animal)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(squirrel, be considered animal)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(squirrel, be considered animal)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, is mammal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(squirrel, be considered animal)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(squirrel, is mammal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(squirrel, be considered animal)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(squirrel, is mammal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(squirrel, be considered animal)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(squirrel, is mammal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(squirrel, be considered animal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(squirrel, be considered animal)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be considered animal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(squirrel, be considered animal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(squirrel, be considered animal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be considered animal)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(raccoon, is mammal)