squirrel: survive in dessert

Related concepts

Parents	predator Weight: 0.71 , wild animal Weight: 0.68 , species Weight: 0.68 , creature Weight: 0.68
Siblings	red squirrel Weight: 0.40 , owl Weight: 0.38 , peregrine falcon Weight: 0.38 , fox Weight: 0.38 , raccoon Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
survive in dessert	1.00
behave in dessert	0.89
survive	0.76
eat	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(predator, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(squirrel, survive in dessert)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(creature, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(squirrel, survive in dessert)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(creature, eat)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(predator, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(creature, eat)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(predator, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(raccoon, eat)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(fox, eat)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(owl, eat)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(raccoon, survive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(predator, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(squirrel, survive in dessert)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(creature, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(squirrel, survive in dessert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(raccoon, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(raccoon, eat)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(owl, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(owl, eat)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(fox, eat) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(fox, eat)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(raccoon, survive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(raccoon, survive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(squirrel, survive in dessert)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(squirrel, behave in dessert)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, behave in dessert)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(squirrel, behave in dessert)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(squirrel, behave in dessert)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(squirrel, eat)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(squirrel, eat)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(squirrel, eat)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Salient(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(squirrel, survive in dessert)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(creature, eat)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(predator, eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(raccoon, eat)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(owl, eat)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(fox, eat)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(raccoon, survive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(creature, eat)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(squirrel, survive in dessert) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(predator, eat)