staff: be important in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents team
Weight: 0.70
, professional
Weight: 0.67
, customer
Weight: 0.62
, quality
Weight: 0.62
Siblings assistant
Weight: 0.66
, department
Weight: 0.66
, task force
Weight: 0.65
, office worker
Weight: 0.60
, steward
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in business 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(staff, be important in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(quality, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(staff, be important in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(quality, be important in business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(team, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in business)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(team, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(team, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(staff, be important in business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(quality, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(staff, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(staff, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(staff, be important in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(staff, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(team, be important in business)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(team, be important in business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(staff, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)