stained glass: was made in ages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents art
Weight: 0.39
Siblings painting
Weight: 0.28
, etching
Weight: 0.28
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.28
, decoration
Weight: 0.28
, sculpture
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
was made in ages 1.00
was in ages 0.96
was made in middle ages 0.96
was important in ages 0.95
was in ages different 0.93
was in middle ages 0.91
was important in middle ages 0.91
was in middle ages different 0.90
was in ages different from during renaissance 0.85
was achievement during ages 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(art, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stained glass, was made in ages)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(art, was in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stained glass, was made in ages)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(art, was in middle ages)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(art, was important in middle ages)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(art, was in middle ages)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(art, was important in middle ages)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(art, was important in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(stained glass, was made in ages)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(art, was in middle ages)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(stained glass, was made in ages)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(stained glass, was made in ages)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(stained glass, was made in middle ages)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(stained glass, was made in middle ages)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(stained glass, was made in middle ages)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(stained glass, was made in middle ages)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(stained glass, was achievement during ages)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(stained glass, was achievement during ages)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(stained glass, was achievement during ages)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(stained glass, was achievement during ages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(stained glass, was made in ages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stained glass, was made in ages)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(art, was in middle ages)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(art, was important in middle ages)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(art, was in middle ages)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(stained glass, was made in ages)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(art, was important in middle ages)