stairs: be harder in shoes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.35
Siblings stairwell
Weight: 0.29
, staircase
Weight: 0.29
, basement
Weight: 0.28
, doorway
Weight: 0.28
, ground floor
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harder in shoes 1.00
is harder 0.87
be harder than barefoot 0.86
is hard 0.77
be better than stairmaster 0.77
is easier 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(staircase, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(staircase, is hard)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(staircase, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(stairs, be harder in shoes)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(stairs, be harder than barefoot)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(stairs, be better than stairmaster)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(stairs, is harder)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(stairs, be better than stairmaster)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(stairs, be better than stairmaster)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(stairs, be better than stairmaster)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(stairs, is harder)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(stairs, is harder)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(stairs, is harder)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(stairs, be harder than barefoot)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(stairs, is easier)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(stairs, be harder than barefoot)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(stairs, is hard)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(stairs, be harder than barefoot)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(stairs, is easier)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(stairs, is easier)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(stairs, is hard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(stairs, is hard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(stairs, is hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(stairs, is easier)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(stairs, be harder in shoes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(stairs, be harder in shoes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(stairs, be harder in shoes)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(staircase, is hard)