stand up: be used to talk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, comedian
Weight: 0.52
Siblings think
Weight: 0.33
, stop sign
Weight: 0.32
, remember
Weight: 0.32
, talk show
Weight: 0.32
, home run
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to talk 1.00
be motivated by talk to group 0.84
be motivated by speak 0.80
be used to know 0.78
requires find something to think about 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(remember, be used to know)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(remember, be used to know)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(remember, be used to know)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(stand up, be used to talk)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(stand up, be motivated by talk to group)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(stand up, be motivated by talk to group)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(stand up, be motivated by speak)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(stand up, be motivated by speak)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(stand up, be motivated by talk to group)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(stand up, be motivated by talk to group)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(stand up, be motivated by speak)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(stand up, be motivated by speak)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stand up, be used to talk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(stand up, be used to talk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(stand up, be used to talk)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(remember, be used to know)