standard: be important for developing multimedia content

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.66
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.66
, guideline
Weight: 0.66
, method
Weight: 0.66
, definition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for developing multimedia content 1.00
be important for multimedia content 0.98
be as important as content 0.86
be as important as content in website development 0.85
be as important as content itself in website development 0.83
be as important as content itself 0.82
is mobile app development essential 0.80
is mobile app development 0.79
be important for digital photography 0.79
be important in programming 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(parameter, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(concept, be as important as content in website development)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself in website development)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(concept, be as important as content)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(concept, be as important as content)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(concept, be as important as content in website development)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself in website development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(parameter, be important in programming)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(parameter, be important in programming)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(concept, be as important as content in website development)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(concept, be as important as content itself in website development)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(concept, be as important as content)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(concept, be as important as content itself)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(format, be important for digital photography)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(concept, be as important as content in website development)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself in website development)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(parameter, be important in programming)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(concept, be as important as content)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(format, be important for digital photography)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(format, be important for digital photography)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content itself)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content itself in website development)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content in website development)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(parameter, be important in programming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(format, be important for digital photography)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content in website development)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content itself)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content itself in website development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(standard, be important for developing multimedia content)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(parameter, be important in programming)