standard: be important for internet protocols

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.66
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.66
, guideline
Weight: 0.66
, method
Weight: 0.66
, definition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for internet protocols 1.00
be important for protocols 0.95
be necessary for networks 0.79
be important in data communication 0.79
be needed in computer networks 0.78
be needed in data communication 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(standard, be important for internet protocols)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(standard, be important for protocols)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for protocols)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for protocols)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(standard, be important for protocols)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(standard, be important in data communication)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(standard, be important in data communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for internet protocols)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(standard, be important for internet protocols)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(standard, be important for internet protocols)