standard: be important in data communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.66
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.66
, guideline
Weight: 0.66
, method
Weight: 0.66
, definition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in data communication 1.00
be needed in data communication 0.97
be necessary in study of communication 0.87
be important in communications 0.85
be important for internet protocols 0.79
be needed in computer networks 0.76
be important for protocols 0.76
be important in research 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(method, be important in research)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(definition, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(definition, be important in research)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(method, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(method, be important in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(standard, be important in data communication)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(standard, be important in communications)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in communications)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(standard, be important in communications)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(standard, be important for protocols)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(standard, be important in communications)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for protocols)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for protocols)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(standard, be important for protocols)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(standard, be important in data communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(definition, be important in research)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(method, be important in research)