standard: be important to telecommunications industry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.66
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.66
, guideline
Weight: 0.66
, method
Weight: 0.66
, definition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to telecommunications industry 1.00
be important to computing industry 0.82
be important in communications 0.78
be important in business 0.75
be important in aviation 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(factor, be important in aviation)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in aviation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in aviation)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(factor, be important in aviation)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(quality, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(quality, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(standard, be important to computing industry)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(standard, be important in communications)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(standard, be important to computing industry)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(standard, be important to computing industry)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(standard, be important in communications)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(standard, be important in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(standard, be important in communications)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(standard, be important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(standard, be important in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important to computing industry)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in communications)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(factor, be important in aviation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quality, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(standard, be important to telecommunications industry)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(factor, be important in aviation)