standard: be more popular than wild

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.66
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.66
, guideline
Weight: 0.66
, method
Weight: 0.66
, definition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more popular than wild 1.00
is popular 0.78
is used more 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(concept, is popular)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(standard, be more popular than wild)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(standard, be more popular than wild)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(concept, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(standard, be more popular than wild)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(concept, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(standard, be more popular than wild)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(method, is used more)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(concept, is popular)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(standard, be more popular than wild)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(standard, be more popular than wild)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(standard, be more popular than wild)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(method, is used more)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(method, is used more)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(standard, be more popular than wild)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(standard, be more popular than wild)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(standard, be more popular than wild)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(standard, be more popular than wild)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(standard, be more popular than wild)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(standard, be more popular than wild)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(standard, be more popular than wild)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(standard, be more popular than wild)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(concept, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(standard, be more popular than wild)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(method, is used more)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(standard, be more popular than wild)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(concept, is popular)