standard: be necessary for networks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.66
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.66
, guideline
Weight: 0.66
, method
Weight: 0.66
, definition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be necessary for networks 1.00
be needed in computer networks 0.92
be important for internet protocols 0.79
is necessary 0.78
be needed in data communication 0.77
be needed in networking 0.76
be important in programming 0.75
be as important as content itself 0.75
be as important as content 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(parameter, be important in programming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(concept, be as important as content) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mechanism, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(factor, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary for networks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(factor, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(concept, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(mechanism, is necessary)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(concept, be as important as content)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(parameter, be important in programming)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(parameter, be important in programming)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(concept, be as important as content)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(concept, be as important as content itself)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mechanism, is necessary)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concept, is necessary)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(factor, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(definition, is necessary)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(method, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(parameter, be important in programming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mechanism, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(factor, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(concept, be as important as content itself) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(concept, be as important as content) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(method, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(method, is necessary)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(definition, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(definition, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(standard, be necessary for networks)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(standard, is necessary)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(standard, is necessary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in computer networks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(standard, is necessary)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in networking)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(standard, is necessary)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in networking)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in networking)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(standard, be needed in networking)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(standard, be important for internet protocols)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(standard, be important for internet protocols)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary for networks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, is necessary)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mechanism, is necessary)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content itself)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(parameter, be important in programming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(method, is necessary)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(definition, is necessary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, is necessary)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(mechanism, is necessary)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content itself)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(concept, be as important as content)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(standard, be necessary for networks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(parameter, be important in programming)